BUSSIE v. STATE (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Quinnteris D. BUSSIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1803

Decided: January 22, 2019

Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Michael J. Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant's probation and the resulting sentence, but remand for the trial court to enter a corrected written order specifying that the Appellant only admitted violating the conditions of probation as alleged in the affidavit of violation of probation. See Altman v. State, 252 So.3d 426, 426 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (citing to Margolis v. State, 148 So.3d 532, 532 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (affirming revocation of probation and resulting sentence, but remanding for entry of corrected revocation order of listing only the conditions of probation to which the defendant admitted); Narvaez v. State, 674 So.2d 868, 869 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (noting that written order of revocation must comport with oral pronouncement, and remanding with instructions to strike from the order violations neither admitted to nor found by the court). Appellant need not be present for this correction.

Affirmed, but Remanded for correction.

Per Curiam.

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network