CHARRY v. TORRES (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Anna M. CHARRY, Appellant, v. IN RE: Mariana TORRES v. Alexis Gonzalez, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1014

Decided: January 23, 2019

Before LOGUE and SCALES, JJ., and LUCK, Associate Judge.

Todd Ostegard, for appellant. Kula & Associates, P.A., and Elliot B. Kula and Ashley P. Singrossi, for appellee Mariana Torres.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court's order denying her motion to intervene following a hearing. We review the denial of the motion to intervene for an abuse of discretion. See Abujasen v. Dreke, 118 So.3d 235, 235 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (citing Barnhill v. Fla. Microsoft Anti-Trust Litig., 905 So.2d 195, 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“The standard of review of an order on a motion to intervene is abuse of discretion.”) ). Although a hearing was held on Appellant's motion, there is no transcript of the hearing. Under the circumstances of this case, in the absence of a transcript, we cannot reasonably conclude that the trial court abused its discretion, and therefore, we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979); Shojaie v. Gables Court Prof'l Ctr., Inc., 974 So.2d 1140, 1141-42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Affirmed.

LOGUE, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network