T.D.W., Appellant, v. STATE (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

T.D.W., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D22-361

Decided: November 02, 2022

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Susan M. Shanahan, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

T.D.W., a juvenile, appeals the order finding that he violated his probation. We affirm in all respects except that we remand for the court to correct the violation order.

The record shows that a written violation order was rendered, but it did not specify the conditions that T.D.W. was found to have violated. The State concedes that this was error. “[T]he law is well-settled: if the trial court revokes a juvenile's probation, the court is required to render a written order setting forth the conditions of probation that were violated.” Badgers v. State, 267 So. 3d 512, 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (alteration in original) (quoting T.M. v. State, 233 So. 3d 1275, 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)). Accordingly, we affirm but remand for the trial court to enter a written revocation order setting forth the specific conditions of probation that T.D.W. was found to have violated.

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

KHOUZAM, Judge.

KELLY and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network