BPI SPORTS LLC v. FLORIDA SUPPLEMENT LLC (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

BPI SPORTS, LLC, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA SUPPLEMENT, LLC, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 3D22-0186

Decided: October 26, 2022

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.

The Alderman Law Firm, Jason R. Alderman, Troy A. Tolentino, Alonso Appeals, and Cristina Alonso (Pembroke Pines), for petitioner. Weber Law, P.A., and Steven D. Weber, for respondent Florida Supplement, LLC.

We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny relief. See Vital Pharms., Inc. v. Kesten, 47 Fla. L. Weekly D1783, D1783–84, 2022 WL 3640891 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 24, 2022); Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So. 2d 1097, 1098 (Fla. 1987), superseded by statute on other grounds, § 768.72, Fla. Stat. (2021); High Five Prod., Inc. v. Riddle, 286 So. 3d 890, 890 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019); Brand v. Old Republic Nat. Title Ins. Co., 797 So. 2d 643, 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Petition denied.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network