CURRY v. STATE (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Ronald CURRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D22-2008

Decided: October 21, 2022

Ronald Curry, Orlando, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

The appellant, Ronald Curry, continues to raise the same claim of error, which has been considered on the merits, disposed of by the trial court, and reviewed in this court on multiple occasions. The continuous attempts by this appellant to revisit this issue are frivolous and an abuse of this court's process.

As such, the appellant is cautioned that any further pro se pleadings filed in this court asserting the claim raised in this case and regarding the sentence imposed in Orange County Circuit Case No. 2010-CF-009187-D-O may result in Spencer sanctions being imposed. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

APPELLANT WARNED.

PER CURIAM.

COHEN, SASSO and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network