LINDO v. LINDO (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Liane LINDO, Appellant, v. Richard A. LINDO, Appellee.

No. 3D22-0466

Decided: October 19, 2022

Before LINDSEY, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

Cruz Legal, P.A., and Marisol Cruz, for appellant. Filler Rodriguez, LLP, and Catherine M. Rodriguez, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Labor Ready Se. Inc. v. Australian Warehouses Condo. Ass'n, 962 So. 2d 1053, 1056 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (explaining that where the case had been pending for more than four years, there was “no ambush or violation of the procedural safeguards that [Florida] Rule [of Civil Procedure] 1.440 was designed to protect”); see also Bryan v. Bryan, 930 So. 2d 693, 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (noting that there is no bright-line rule against adoption of a proposed order and differentiating Perlow v. Berg-Perlow, 875 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 2004) where the record reflects trial judge exercised independent judgment based on the trial court's active participation during the final hearing and permitted both parties to submit proposed orders before entering the order at issue).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network