GONZALEZ v. STATE (2022)

Appellant George M. Gonzalez appeals the trial court's summary denial of his motion for extension of time to file a motion for post-conviction relief. We dismiss this appeal without prejudice to Appellant filing the intended motion in the trial court within 30 days. See Manning v. State, 28 So. 3d 971, 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (“[W]e hold that when a motion for extension to file a postconviction motion is denied, the defendant should not appeal that order, but should instead file the intended motion as soon as possible, alleging the grounds for the motion to the best of the defendant's ability and further alleging the reason why the motion is untimely. Thereafter, the trial court is authorized and has discretion to dispose of the motion on the issue of timeliness or on any other dispositive issue. Obviously, the trial court cannot grant the motion in favor of the defendant unless it first determines that the motion was timely or that its earlier motion denying the extension warrants reconsideration. This court will review the denial of the motion to extend time, if necessary, when reviewing the order disposing of the postconviction motion.”).

Dismissed without prejudice.

PER CURIAM.