ROMERO v. ROMERO (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jorge L. ROMERO, Appellant, v. Daysi E. ROMERO, Appellee.

No. 3D21-2128

Decided: October 19, 2022

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.

Carlos M. Rippes; Ilene F. Tuckfield, P.A., and Ilene F. Tuckfield, for appellant. Coral Way Law Center, and Miguel San Pedro, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence[.]”); People's Tr. Ins. Co. v. Fernandez, 317 So. 3d 207, 209 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (noting that a trial court has “inherent authority to reconsider and, if deemed appropriate, alter or retract any of its nonfinal rulings prior to entry of the final judgment or order terminating an action ․”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network