BAILEMZ v. STATE (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Tremaine Latroy BAILEMZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0910

Decided: August 16, 2018

The portion of the petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the postconviction court to rule on motions for postconviction relief filed on or about August 8, August 23, October 26, and December 5, 2017, is denied without prejudice because it appears that proceedings in the circuit court relating to those motions are progressing. The portion of the petition seeking to compel a ruling on a November 28, 2017, motion for discharge is denied as moot. To the extent that Petitioner seeks to compel the circuit court to rule on any additional motions, Petitioner must raises those issues in a new petition for writ of mandamus. Petitioner's request for oral argument, motions for relief, motion for extension of time, and motions to correct the record are denied as moot. Petitioner's motion to dismiss and motion for appointment of counsel for postconviction proceedings are denied without prejudice to Petitioner filing those motions in the circuit court.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

BLACK, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network