HALPERN v. KOIKOS (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Keith A. HALPERN, Appellant, v. Nikoleta G. KOIKOS, Appellee.

No. 1D17-792

Decided: October 31, 2018

Keith A. Halpern, pro se, Appellant. No appearance, for Appellee.

Appellant challenges the injunction against domestic violence entered January 26, 2017, after the final hearing held that same date. Appellant argues that the injunction was not supported by competent substantial evidence. However, after our order allowing Appellant to supplement the record with a transcript of the hearing or stipulated statement of the evidence, he did not do so. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.200(b)(4), (f)(2). Accordingly, we must affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979); Murphy v. Blubaugh, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1712, 252 So.3d 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); Jackson v. Echols, 937 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Ricketts v. Ricketts, 790 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Ain v. Ain, 778 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

Per Curiam.

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network