INVO INC v. RING POWER CORPORATION (2022)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

INVO, INC., Appellant, v. RING POWER CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 1D21-2102

Decided: October 12, 2022

Michael R. Vater of The Ticktin Law Group, Deerfield Beach, for Appellant. Christen E. Luikart, Catherine M. Licandro, and Jordan Janoski of Murphy & Anderson, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); Thurman v. Davis, 321 So. 3d 341, 344 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (“Without a transcript or statement of the evidence, the reviewing court is ‘limited to a consideration of any fundamental error which appears on the face of the order’ and, finding none, must affirm the final judgment.”) (quoting Carney v. Carney, 861 So. 2d 1272, 1273–74 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)).

Per Curiam.

Kelsey, Jay, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network