MENDOZA v. STATE (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Brianna C. MENDOZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2761

Decided: August 24, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Brianna Mendoza seeks correction of the order finding her in violation of her probation. She does not challenge the finding that she violated probation or the resulting sentence, and we affirm both without comment. But because the revocation order should reflect the oral pronouncement, we remand for the trial court to strike the revocation order and enter a corrected revocation order reflecting two condition 5 violations and conforming to the oral pronouncement in all other respects. See Reed v. State, 127 So.3d 817, 819 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

BLACK, Judge.

LaROSE, C.J. and SALARIO, J., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network