CLAUSEN v. CLAUSEN (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Wayne R. CLAUSEN, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Susan A. CLAUSEN, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Case No. 5D16-4114

Decided: August 17, 2018

John N. Bogdanoff and Shannon McLin Carlyle, of The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, Orlando, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Andrew Graf and Dusty Twyman, of Rohe Twyman, P.A., Winter Garden, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Wayne Clausen (the Former Husband) appeals the final judgment of dissolution of marriage entered by the trial court, and Susan Clausen (the Former Wife) cross-appeals. We affirm without discussion all issues raised in the appeal and all issues raised in the cross-appeal, except issues related to the alimony award. As to that award, we reverse and remand for further proceedings because the trial court erred in failing to include income imputed to the Former Wife in its calculations and erred in failing to consider the child-related expenses being incurred by the Former Husband.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

PER CURIAM.

PALMER, ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network