RYALS v. JUDD (2018)

Because it appears that the circuit court did not consider all of the relevant factors in denying Petitioner's motion to reduce bond and the record before this court does not justify the amount of bond imposed, see Rainev v. Lamberti, 9 So. 3d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Cepero v. Mascara, 981 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), we grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus as follows. We remand the matter to the trial court for a new determination on reasonable bond upon consideration of all of the appropriate factors. See § 903.046(2), Fla. Stat. (2017); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.131 (b)(3). On remand, the court may hear additional evidence in support of the reasonableness of the bond.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

KELLY, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.