TEODORO v. TEODORO (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jacqueline TEODORO, Appellant, v. Emilio TEODORO, Appellee.

No. 3D17–830

Decided: June 06, 2018

Before, EMAS, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

John J. Anastasio (Stuart), for appellant. David L. Margolesky, Miami, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Watt v. Watt, 966 So.2d 455, 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (“Shared parental responsibility assumes that the parties can come to agreement on the welfare of their children. Where the parties cannot and will not come to agreement, the trial court can determine that such an impasse constitutes a substantial change in circumstance, requiring modification of the final judgment in the best interest of the children. Because competent substantial evidence supports the trial court's determinations in this case, we affirm the final judgment of modification.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network