Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
U.S. BANK, N.A., etc., Appellant, v. WESTERN HOMES, LLC, Appellee.
In this foreclosure case, U.S. Bank, N.A., Successor Trustee to Bank of America, N.A., Successor in Interest to Lasalle Bank N.A., as Trustee, on behalf of the Holders of the WAMU Mortgage Pass–Through Certificates, Series 2007–OA2 (“U.S. Bank”), appeals the September 28, 2015 final summary judgment entered in favor of Western Homes, LLC, et al. (“Western Homes”) and the November 3, 2015 order denying U.S. Bank's motion for rehearing.
The transcripts of the summary judgment hearing demonstrate that the trial court, in agreement with the arguments raised in Western Homes' motion for summary judgment, found that U.S. Bank's foreclosure action was barred by the statute of limitations based on this Court's then-current panel decision in Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas v. Beauvais, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D1, 2014 WL 7156961 (Fla. 3d DCA Dec. 17, 2014), opinion withdrawn and superseded on reh'g en banc, 188 So. 3d 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).
However, while U.S. Bank's appeal was pending, this Court withdrew the Beauvais panel opinion and substituted an en banc opinion in its place. See Beauvais, 188 So.3d at 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), review denied sub nom. Aqua Master Ass'n, Inc. v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. Ams., ––– So.3d ––––, 2018 WL 1136530, at *1 (Fla. Mar. 2, 2018). As in Wilmington Trust, N.A. v. Alvarez, 239 So.3d 1265 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018), we reverse the final summary judgment and remand this cause to the trial court for further consideration in light of our Beauvais en banc opinion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D15–2667
Decided: June 06, 2018
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)