Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. and Carrier Equipment, Inc., Appellants, v. SEABOARD MARINE LTD., Appellee.
Defendants/counter-plaintiffs/appellants, Transportation Services, Inc., and Carrier Equipment, Inc., have appealed an order in favor of plaintiff/counter-defendant/appellee, Seaboard Marine Ltd., captioned “Final Judgment for Counterdefendant Seaboard Marine.” That order granted Seaboard Marine's motion for summary judgment on the appellants' counterclaims, dismissing those counterclaims, and concluding that the appellants “shall take nothing by this suit and [the appellee] shall go hence without day.” The order did not address or dispose of the appellee's still-pending claims as plaintiff against the appellants; those claims and the appellants' counterclaims arose from the same transactions and occurrences.
We issued an order to the parties to show cause why the order on appeal should not be reversed to exclude the purported words of finality, “go hence without day,” without prejudice to the rights of the parties to appeal when both the claims and counterclaims have been fully adjudicated, citing Haven Center, Inc. v. Meruelo, 22 So.3d 849, 850 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). No responses were filed.
We reverse the order sought to be appealed, and remand the case for the deletion from the order of the phrase “go hence without day.” The reversal does not disturb the trial court's decision to grant the appellee's motion for summary judgment on the counterclaim, and is without prejudice to the rights of the parties to appeal when the claims and counterclaims have been fully adjudicated.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D17–1682
Decided: May 30, 2018
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)