STATE v. BRADLEY (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Ray BRADLEY, Appellee.

No. 3D17–726

Decided: May 30, 2018

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ and SALTER, JJ.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Holland & Knight and Frances Guasch De La Guardia, Miami; Miriam Ramos, City Attorney, for City of Coral Gables, as amicus curiae.

We affirm the order below requiring resentencing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), and Atwell v. State, 197 So.3d 1040 (Fla. 2016). As requested by the State, we acknowledge pipeline eligibility in the Florida Supreme Court based on that Court's pending decision in State v. Michel, No. SC16–2187, 2017 WL 3484282 (order accepting jurisdiction, Jan. 18, 2017).

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network