Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
NORTHPORT HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, LLC and NHS Management, LLC, Appellants, v. ESTATE OF Gertrude R. CHAMPAGNE BY AND THROUGH Gloria OLSEN, Personal Representative, Appellee.
Northport Health Services of Florida, LLC d/b/a West Melbourne Health and Rehabilitation Center, appeals the trial court's order denying Northport's motion to compel arbitration with Gloria Olsen, as personal representative of the Estate of Gertrude R. Champagne.
We have recently addressed the enforceability of an identical arbitration agreement in Northport Health Services of Florida, LLC v. Louis, 240 So.3d 120 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 2, 2018). We held in Louis that the provision requiring Alabama's Rules of Evidence to control the admissibility of evidence at arbitration was against public policy, and that the provision was severable because it concerns procedure. Id. at –––– at D506. However, we also held that the provision requiring the application of Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure to the parties' conduct of pre-hearing discovery does not violate public policy because no convincing argument was raised as to why the application is problematic. Id.
Here, the parties raise essentially the same arguments. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions to the trial court to grant Northport's motion to compel and to sever from the arbitration agreement the provision applying the Alabama Rules of Evidence to the admissibility of evidence at the arbitration hearing. Id.; see also Hancock v. Northport Health Servs. of Fla., LLC, 150 So.3d 1262, 1263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (affirming an order compelling arbitration of an identical arbitration agreement).
REVERSED and REMANDED, with Instructions.
WALLIS, J.
SAWAYA and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Case No. 5D17–2693
Decided: April 13, 2018
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)