BEARDEN v. STATE (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Edward BEARDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17–5114

Decided: May 02, 2018

Edward Bearden, pro se.

Affirmed. See Allen v. State, 684 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 1996); State v. Enmund, 476 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 1985); Harmon v. State, 438 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 1983); Borges v. State, 415 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 1982); Coughlin v. State, 932 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (en banc); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Emmett v. State, 764 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Washington v. State, 752 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc); Bearden v. State, 481 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Adams v. State, 435 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

PER CURIAM.

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network