ROGERS v. STATE (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Donald Lee ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17–0414

Decided: April 18, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

In this Anders ^* appeal, we affirm Appellant's judgment and sentences, but remand for the trial court to enter a written order specifying that Appellant admitted violating only certain conditions of probation., as alleged in Grounds VI–XIV of the amended affidavit of violation of probation. See Pittman v. State, 867 So.2d 621, 622 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (remanding for entry of formal order revoking probation that listed only the violations that had been admitted); Narvaez v. State, 674 So.2d 868, 869 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (noting that written order of revocation must comport with the oral pronouncement and remanding with instructions to strike violations neither admitted to nor found by the court from the order). Appellant need not be present.

Affirmed but Remanded for correction.

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Per Curiam.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Lewis and Makar, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network