ROSIER v. STATE (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Belafonte Lopez ROSIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17–3047

Decided: March 21, 2018

Belafonte Lopez Rosier, pro se.

Affirmed. See State v. King, 426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982); State v. Templar–O'Brien, 173 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); State v. Burgess, 153 So. 3d 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Doby v. State, 25 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Rosier v. State, 939 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (table decision); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Campbell v. State, 884 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Williams v. State, 452 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Gary v. State, 5 So. 3d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Jones v. State, 907 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Harris v. State, 789 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Sequoia v. State, 678 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

PER CURIAM.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network