FORNEY v. STATE (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

James FORNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17–3854

Decided: February 28, 2018

James Forney, Raiford, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant's successive rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We write only to address appellant's claim that the orders entered after he filed a motion to disqualify the trial judge were void. This claim is meritless because appellant failed to serve the motion on the judge. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(c), (j); Braddy v. State, 111 So.3d 810, 833 (Fla. 2012); Hedrick v. State, 6 So.3d 688, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Affirmed.

Per Curiam.

Warner, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network