COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY INC v. MARTINEZ (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Juan MARTINEZ, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17–2524

Decided: January 19, 2018

Upon consideration, respondent's motion to strike belated reply is hereby denied.

Following review of the petition for writ of certiorari, and the response and reply thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby dismissed. See Walgreen Co. v. Rubin, 229 So. 3d 418 (Fla. 3d 2017); Topp Telecom, Inc. v. Atkins, 763 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

SUAREZ, LAGOA and SCALES, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network