ALLMOND v. DALE CARSON LAW (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Darryl ALLMOND, Appellant, v. DALE CARSON LAW and Samantha Caldwell, Appellees.

No. 1D17–2622

Decided: January 29, 2018

Darryl Allmond, pro se, Appellant. Michael R. D'Lugo of Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees.

Upon the court's own motion, we find that the Initial Brief fails to comply with rule 9.210(b)(1)–(6), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure and that Appellant's references to ineffective assistance of counsel in the Initial Brief have no application to the summary final judgment entered in the civil action below. Because Appellant demonstrates no preliminary basis for reversal of the order appealed, summary affirmance is warranted under rule 9.315, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Cabrera v. Outdoor Empire Inc., 134 So.3d 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Spencer v. Fla. Power Light/Broadspire, 141 So.3d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Accordingly, the summary final judgment appealed is Affirmed.

Per Curiam.

Lewis, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network