SULLIVAN v. WAHOLEK (2017)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Michael SULLIVAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Heather Ann WAHOLEK, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17–4104

Decided: December 08, 2017

Appellant's motion for continuation with response for dismissal is treated as a response to this court's November 27, 2017, order to show cause. This appeal is dismissed as from a nonfinal, nonappealable order. See Agere Sys. Inc. v. All Am. Crating, Inc., 931 So. 2d 244, 245 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (“[A]n order that simply denies a motion for reconsideration or rehearing of an underlying nonfinal order, such as the one sought to be appealed in this case, is not in itself an appealable order.”).

Appellee's motion to dismiss is denied as moot.

Appellant's motion for an extension of time is denied as moot.

Appellee's motion for appellate attorney's fees is denied.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network