Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Petitioner, v. 37C TEAM, LLC, Respondent.
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari and response thereto, we find that with respect to the discovery materials that are the subject of this petition, the trial court's order denying in part Bank of America's motion for protective order departs from the essential requirements of the law, thereby causing irreparable injury. See Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Figueroa, 299 So. 3d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); Rousso v. Hannon, 146 So. 3d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); see also Bank of Am., N.A. v. BCML Holding, LLC, 319 So. 3d 786 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021). Therefore, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order.
Petition granted; order quashed.
LOBREE, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D20-1464
Decided: September 30, 2022
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)