Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Albert QUINN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Albert Quinn appeals the trial court's order denying his motion to clarify sentence without an evidentiary hearing. The trial court found the motion to be successive. We agree. See Quinn v. State, 336 So. 3d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022); State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287, 289-90 (Fla. 2003) (explaining that the law of the case “doctrine requires that ‘questions of law actually decided on appeal must govern the case in the same court and the trial court, through all subsequent stages of the proceedings’ ” (quoting Fla. Dep't. of Transp. v. Juliano, 801 So. 2d 101, 105 (Fla. 2001))).
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D22-0920
Decided: September 30, 2022
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)