HARRIS v. STATE (2022)

Affirmed. See Kovaleski v. State, 103 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 2012). On the issue of costs, reversal is not warranted because the State has identified costs which total the $418 imposed. Cf. Bartolone v. State, 327 So. 3d 331, 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (reversing where the “trial court did not cite to any other mandatory costs, and the State has not identified costs which would total $418”) (emphasis supplied).

Per Curiam.

Klingensmith, C.J., Gross and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.