Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Lecedric Prentice HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Affirmed. See Kovaleski v. State, 103 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 2012). On the issue of costs, reversal is not warranted because the State has identified costs which total the $418 imposed. Cf. Bartolone v. State, 327 So. 3d 331, 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (reversing where the “trial court did not cite to any other mandatory costs, and the State has not identified costs which would total $418”) (emphasis supplied).
Per Curiam.
Klingensmith, C.J., Gross and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D21-3285
Decided: September 14, 2022
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)