HARRIS III v. HARRIS (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Early HARRIS, III, Appellant, v. Tanya Michelle HARRIS, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17–792

Decided: March 29, 2018

Angela Lynn Leiner, of The Law Office of Angela L. Leiner, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant. John J. Albert, of Albert & Donnelly, LLC, Melbourne, for Appellee.

AFFIRMED. See Tramble v. Tramble, 193 So.3d 1105, 1105 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (holding that in absence of transcript or statement of evidence, appellate court's review is limited to errors appearing on face of final judgment or in pleadings and other matters in record); Spreng v. Spreng, 162 So.3d 168, 169 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (holding that although trial court's order awarding wife attorney's fees was deficient in its factual findings, error was not preserved for appeal because husband never filed motion for rehearing); Hedstrom v. Hedstrom, 123 So.3d 150, 152 n.4 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (reiterating that party cannot complain on appeal about inadequate findings unless alleged defect was brought to trial court's attention in motion for rehearing).

PER CURIAM.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network