D.T., Appellant, v. J.M., Appellee. (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

D.T., Appellant, v. J.M., Appellee.

Case No. 2D17–155

Decided: February 14, 2018

Michael M. Brownlee of The Brownlee Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant. Sara M. McKinley of McKinley Law Firm, P.A., Bartow, for Appellee.

D.T., the father, challenges the final judgment of paternity. Although an Interim Order Pending Final Hearing dated July 19, 2016, included a child support guidelines worksheet as an attachment, no such worksheet was attached to the final judgment. And the child support calculations in the final judgment differ from those in the worksheet attached to the interim order without sufficient explanation in the record. See Dep't of Revenue ex rel. R.S.M. v. B.J.M., 127 So.3d 859, 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). We therefore reverse and remand for recalculation of child support. The final judgment of paternity is affirmed in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

KELLY, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network