Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER A/A/O Louis Pena, Respondent.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION TO CERTIFY
Progressive Select Insurance Company has filed a motion for rehearing and a motion to certify a question of great public importance to the Florida Supreme Court. We grant the motion for rehearing and the motion to certify. We withdraw the previous opinion and substitute the following in its stead.
Progressive petitions this court for a writ of certiorari, seeking to quash an opinion issued by the Circuit Court for Orange County, sitting in its appellate capacity, which affirmed the final judgment entered by the County Court. We deny the petition based upon the reasoning set forth in our opinion in Progressive Select Insurance v. Florida Hospital Medical Center a/a/o Jonathan Parent, No. 5D16–2333, ––– So.3d ––––, 2018 WL 792012 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb. 9, 2018).
We certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as a matter of great public importance:
WHEN CALCULATING THE AMOUNT OF PIP BENEFITS DUE AN INSURED, DOES SECTION 627.739(2), FLORIDA STATUTES, REQUIRE THAT THE DEDUCTIBLE BE SUBTRACTED FROM THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF MEDICAL CHARGES BEFORE APPLYING THE REIMBURSEMENT LIMITATION UNDER SECTION 627.736(5)(a)1.b., OR MUST THE REIMBURSEMENT LIMITATION BE APPLIED FIRST AND THE DEDUCTIBLE SUBTRACTED FROM THE REMAINING AMOUNT?
PETITION DENIED and QUESTION CERTIFIED.
I concur in part and dissent in part for the reasons set forth in my opinion in Progressive Selective Insurance Co. v. Florida Hospital Medical Center a/a/o Jonathan Parent, No. 5D16–2333, ––– So.3d ––––, 2018 WL 792012 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb. 9, 2018).
PER CURIAM.
SAWAYA and EDWARDS, JJ., concur. PALMER, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part, with opinion.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Case No. 5D16–2334
Decided: February 09, 2018
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)