Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Paul McMULLEN, Appellant, v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Trustee for PHH 2007–2; E.P. Wolf Construction, Inc.; Deborah Lee Thompson Perryman; Estate of Charles H. Thompson, Jr., Deceased, Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, Assignees, Creditors, Lienors and Trustees of Charles H. Thompson, Jr., Deceased, and All Other Persons Claiming By, Through, Under, and Against the Named Defendant(s); Garfield B. Thompson, Unknown Parties in Possession # 1; Unknown Parties in Possession # 2: If Living, and all Unknown Parties Claiming By, Through, Under, and Against the Above Named Defendant(s) Who Are Not known To Be Dead or Alive, Whether Said Unknown Parties May Claim An Interest As Spouse, Heirs, Devisees, Grantees or Other Claimants, Appellee.
Appellant, Paul McMullen, appeals the denial of his motion to vacate a final judgment of foreclosure and argues that because he did not receive notice of the summary judgment hearing,1 the trial court erred in not vacating the foreclosure judgment. We reject Appellant's argument because, as argued by Appellee, HSBC Bank USA, a judicial default was entered in this case. See Matejka v. Dulaney, 40 So.3d 865, 866 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (noting that a default admits every cause of action that is sufficiently well-pled as well as a plaintiff's entitlement to liquidated damages); see also Zumpf v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 43 So.3d 764, 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (“Generally, in a foreclosure action, unpaid principal and interest are ‘liquidated damages,’ and a defaulting party is not entitled to notice of hearing determining those amounts where the exact sums are set forth.”); Donohue v. Brightman, 939 So.2d 1162, 1164 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“A default terminates the defending party's right to further defend, except to contest the amount of unliquidated damages.”); Asian Imports, Inc. v. Pepe, 633 So.2d 551, 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (noting that actions for the sums directly due on negotiable instruments are actions for liquidated damages). However, because the foreclosure judgment also included unliquidated damages, including, for example, attorney's fees, we reverse and remand for a hearing on the amount of unliquidated damages owed to Appellee. See Pepe, 633 So.2d at 553 (affirming the trial court's ruling denying the defendants' motion to vacate the final judgment of foreclosure except as to the provision for attorney's fees because the fees were unliquidated damages).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Notice of Hearing was sent by U.S. mail to the law firm representing Appellant and to the email address of Appellant's former attorney rather than the email address designated by the firm pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b).
PER CURIAM.
LEWIS, C.J., CLARK and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 1D14–1737.
Decided: October 14, 2014
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)