Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Stuart ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. Stacey K. BAMASH, etc., Estate of Miriam Bamash, Appellee.
ORDER
Appellant, who is incarcerated and indigent, is appealing an order determining that he is not a beneficiary of an estate as well as other final orders. He filed directions to the clerk to prepare the record and requested a transcript. Having received neither, he has filed motions asking this court to order the clerk to prepare the record and the court reporter to prepare the transcript at no cost to him.
We deny appellant's motion requesting a free transcript, because there is no constitutional or statutory right to one in an appeal by an indigent litigant in a civil case. Lee County v. Eaton, 642 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).
As to the record, section 57.081(1), Florida Statutes (2001) provides:
Any indigent person ․ who is a party ․ shall receive the services of the courts, sheriffs, and clerks, with respect to such proceedings, without charge. Such services are limited to filing fees; service of process; certified copies of orders or final judgments; a single photocopy of any court pleading, record, or instrument filed with the clerk; examining fees; mediation services and fees; court-appointed counsel fees; subpoena fees and services; service charges for collecting and disbursing funds; and any other cost of service arising out of pending litigation. [emphasis added.]
We conclude that the last emphasized part of the statute requires the clerk to prepare the record and furnish a copy of the index to appellant. The first emphasized portion would entitle appellant to receive, upon request to the clerk, copies of any documents in the record. We therefore direct the clerk to prepare the record without charge.
PER CURIAM.
GUNTHER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D02-41.
Decided: April 24, 2002
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)