Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Merejildo Garcia VILLEGAS a/k/a Hermenegildo Villegas, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Merejildo Garcia Villegas appeals from his judgment and sentence for carrying a concealed firearm. He contends that it was error for the trial court to deny his motion for judgment of acquittal. We agree and reverse.
On November 28, 1995, Detective Kennedy of the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office was a backup officer in a narcotics stakeout. He observed Villegas sitting in his pickup truck conversing with the driver of another vehicle. During the arrests of the subjects of the narcotics investigation, Detective Kennedy approached Villegas' truck. When he was six-to-eight feet away, he observed Villegas' arms moving and then he observed a firearm in Villegas' left hand. Kennedy yelled “drop the gun” and Villegas put the gun on the floor of the truck. Detective Parks, who approached the truck from the passenger's side, also observed the gun in Villegas' hand.
At the close of the state's case, the defense moved for judgment of acquittal, arguing that there was no proof of concealment. The prosecutor's position was that the gun was concealed in the moments before Kennedy or Parks observed the gun and while Villegas was moving his arms. The court denied the motion and Villegas was convicted.
The test, however, is not whether Kennedy or Parks could see the gun in the moments before it was observed in Villegas' left hand, but whether the firearm was hidden from the ordinary sight of others. See Ensor v. State, 403 So.2d 349 (Fla.1981); Carpenter v. State, 593 So.2d 606 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). Proof of such concealment is an essential element of the offense charged which must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Padron-Canto v. State, 414 So.2d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Here, the only evidence of Villegas' possession of the firearm was testimony that Villegas held the firearm in such a way as to be plainly visible to the ordinary sight of another. Because there was no proof of concealment, the court erred in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal.
Reversed and remanded with directions that Villegas be discharged.
PATTERSON, Judge.
PARKER, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 95-03415.
Decided: March 12, 1997
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)