Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Tamesa M. WILLIS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Appellee.
Tamesa M. Willis appeals from a final administrative order requiring her to reimburse the Department of Children and Family Services [Department] for the overpayment of Aid for Dependent Children [AFDC] benefits and the overissuance of food stamp benefits. We affirm.
In the instant case, Ms. Willis' AFDC and food stamp benefits were overpaid as a result of the Department's error. Ms. Willis argues that because the overpayments were as a result of the Department's error, she should not be required to repay the amounts that were overpaid.
This issue has been directly addressed in Lewis v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 659 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). In Lewis, as in the present case, AFDC and food stamps benefits were overpaid as a result of the administrative agency's error. The Lewis Court acknowledged that pursuant to the Florida Administrative Code and the Code of Federal Regulations, the agency is required to recoup the overpayments, and that under the circumstances, the doctrine of equitable estoppel was not applicable. Lewis, 659 So.2d at 1256; see also, Story v. State, Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., Dist. 10, 666 So.2d 989 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). As in Lewis, we find that the Department, regardless of its error, correctly found that Ms. Willis must reimburse the Department for the overissuance and overpayment of the benefits.
Although we must affirm the Department's final order, we acknowledge that as a result of the Department's error of which Ms. Willis had no notice, she will now have to repay the Department at a time when she is struggling to provide for her family. We sympathize with Ms. Willis and believe that her frustration with the situation created by the Department is well founded.
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 98-211.
Decided: June 23, 1999
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)