Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Gloria I. MEDINA, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
Gloria I. Medina (Medina) on behalf of herself and her two minor children, on March 5, 1998, applied for food stamps and WAGES benefits which are issued by the appellee Department of Children and Families (Department). The record indicates that Medina withdrew $1,000 from her checking account shortly before making her application. The Department denied Medina's application when she failed to adequately account for these funds. The Department also disqualified her from future eligibility for a period of ninety days.
Medina requested and was granted a hearing. The hearing officer, on July 22, 1998, issued a decision upholding the Department's denial of Medina's application. The hearing officer also found that the ninety day sanction of ineligibility was improper because there was insufficient evidence of an intentional violation. However, the hearing officer found the error to be harmless since Medina had not applied for benefits during this time period.
Rule 65A–1.205(d) of the Florida Administrative Code provides that if an applicant fails to provide certain verification or information as requested by the Department, the application will be denied. The record in the instant case indicates that Medina failed to provide the required verification to adequately account for the money that she had withdrawn from her account shortly before the date of her application. Thus, the Department properly denied her application for benefits.
Medina argues that the ninety day sanction of ineligibility was not harmless error. We agree. The sanction becomes part of Medina's permanent food stamp record and may be prejudicial to her in the event she applies for benefits in the future.
Accordingly, we REVERSE that portion of the order which upheld the ninety day sanction imposed for an intentional program violation, with directions that it be stricken from her record.
We AFFIRM the denial of benefits with respect to Medina's application of March 5, 1998.
PER CURIAM.
ALLEN, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 98–3025.
Decided: July 09, 1999
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)