Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
S.J.J., a child, Petitioner, v. John GNAT, Superintendent, Duval County Regional Juvenile Detention Center, Respondent.
S.J.J., a juvenile, is charged with possession of marijuana within 1,000 feet of a school with intent to sell. This is a second-degree felony pursuant to section 893.13(1)(c)2, Florida Statutes (1997). He was initially placed in secure detention but later placed in home detention with electronic monitoring. He petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that he does not qualify for any form of detention prior to the adjudicatory hearing under the provisions of section 985.215(2)(f), Florida Statutes. That is, a juvenile charged with a second-degree felony involving a violation of chapter 893 is not qualified for detention unless he meets one or more certain criteria set forth in the statute. Those criteria include a record of failure to appear at court hearings, a record of law violations prior to court hearings, other pending charges, a record of violent conduct, or possession of a firearm. See § 985.215(2)(f)1-5, Fla. Stat. It is undisputed that petitioner has no prior criminal record and does not meet any of these additional statutory criteria.
In response to this court's order to show cause why the petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be granted, the state agrees that petitioner is entitled to the relief sought.
Accordingly, we grant the petition and issue the writ of habeas corpus, directing the circuit court to immediately enter an order releasing S.J.J. from detention until commencement of the adjudicatory hearing. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and this court's mandate shall issue forthwith.
PETITION GRANTED.
PER CURIAM.
KAHN, MICKLE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 98-631.
Decided: February 27, 1998
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)