INGRAHM v. INGRAHM (1998)

District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fifth District.

Audrey INGRAHM, Appellant, v. Robert James INGRAHM, Appellee.

No. 97-3393.

Decided: June 12, 1998

James R. Evans& Horace Smith, Jr., P.A., Smith, Hood, Perkins, Loucks, Stout, Orfinger and Selis, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Theodore R. Doran of Doran, Walters, Rost & Wolfe, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

We reverse the order of the Seminole County Circuit Court denying the appellant's motion to transfer venue over the appellee's petition for modification of alimony from Seminole to Volusia County. Prior to the appellee's filing of his petition, appellant, as the party to whom the alimony is owed, filed a complaint for enforcement of final judgment of dissolution in the Circuit Court for Volusia County, her county of residence. See § 61.17, Fla. Stat.; Bryant v. Bryant, 566 So.2d 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Appellee served an answer. Once the enforcement proceeding was undertaken in an appropriate venue, venue was improper in a different county over the subsequently filed petition to modify the same decree which was the subject of the enforcement proceedings. See Bailey v. Malone, 389 So.2d 348 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

COBB, Judge.

GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law