WINGATE v. STATE (1999)

District Court of Appeal of Florida,First District.

Ronald Lamar WINGATE v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-1470.

Decided: March 26, 1999

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Tallahassee; Meredith Charbula, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Sherri Tolar Rollison and Trisha E. Meggs, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is not properly raised on direct appeal, particularly in light of the enactment of section 924.051, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996). See McKinney v. State, 579 So.2d 80 (Fla.1991); Gibson v. State, 351 So.2d 948 (Fla.1977); State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974); Dennis v. State, 696 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We therefore affirm without prejudice to appellant bringing the claim in an appropriate proceeding under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

We find the evidence sufficient to sustain appellant's conviction for tampering with evidence. See State v. Jennings, 666 So.2d 131 (Fla.1995); McKenzie v. State, 632 So.2d 276 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

ERVIN, BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network