Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
William Russell HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
In this consolidated appeal, William Russell Hill challenges the jury conviction and sentence imposed after he withdrew from a plea agreement. Additionally, he challenges a trial court order's denying his posttrial motions for a hearing to contest the reasonableness of attorney's fees and costs and for appointment of counsel. We affirm the conviction and sentence imposed without further discussion. However, the final judgment as to attorney's fees and costs is reversed.
On December 13, 1996, the trial court entered a final judgment assessing a total of $78,289.63 in fees and costs for a special appointed public defender. The final judgment specifically stated that Hill could request a hearing on the reasonableness of attorney's fees and costs. Hill timely filed motions for a hearing and for appointment of counsel to represent him during the hearing on fees and costs. On January 9, 1997, the trial court summarily denied the motions.
Pursuant to section 27.56(7), Florida Statutes (1995),1 a defendant shall have the opportunity to be heard to offer objection to a determination of attorney's fees and costs of a special appointed public defender. See also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.720(d). A defendant has the right to be represented at such a hearing, but does not have the right to court-appointed counsel. See Bull v. State, 548 So.2d 1103, 1105 (Fla.1989). Thus, we affirm the order denying the appointment of counsel and reverse the judgment for attorney's fees and costs. On remand the trial court shall conduct a hearing on the reasonableness of attorney's fees and costs after notice to Hill.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded.
FOOTNOTES
1. Section 27.56(7), Florida Statutes (1995) had been renumbered as section 938.29(6), Florida Statutes (1997).
PER CURIAM.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and GREEN and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Nos. 96-05318, 97-00390.
Decided: May 05, 1999
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)