Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Scott A. HUITT, Petitioner, v. Helen HSIA, Respondent.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We deny respondent's motion for rehearing, but substitute the following for our May 20, 2003, slip opinion, correcting a factual misstatement:
The former husband filed this petition for writ of certiorari to review an order denying the disqualification of a domestic relations commissioner hearing the former wife's motion to modify custody and to relocate the parties' child to Virginia where she lives. He sought the commissioner's disqualification from future proceedings on the ground that he feared the commissioner was biased against him. The commissioner stated in her report that a factor in her recommendation in favor of the mother was the mother's religious beliefs and the father's lack thereof.
The Florida Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 3B(5), provides:
A judge shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice. A judge shall not, in the performance of judicial duties, by words or conduct manifest bias or prejudice, including ․ bias or prejudice based upon ․ religion․ This section does not preclude the consideration of ․ religion ․ when [it is an] [ ] issue[ ] in the proceeding.
Because the parties' religious differences were not an issue in the proceeding, the commissioner's questioning and statements would reasonably cause the father to fear the commissioner was personally biased against him on the basis of religion. We grant the petition, and on remand, the case shall be assigned to a different commissioner.
PER CURIAM.
WARNER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 4D03-714.
Decided: July 02, 2003
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)