GOODE v. STATE (1999)

District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fifth District.

Bryan C. GOODE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 97-2598.

Decided: May 07, 1999

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Andrea J. Surette and Michael S. Becker, Assistant Public Defenders, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kelli R. Orndorff, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Bryan Goode appeals from the judgments and sentences entered in four separate cases. We affirm his convictions but reverse and remand for resentencing because of various guideline scoresheet errors.

At sentencing, the trial court did not have the benefit of Dillard v. State, 728 So.2d 725 (Fla.1999), wherein the supreme court explained the procedures to be followed where, as here, two versions of the guidelines are involved. See also Quinn v. State, 692 So.2d 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (“[T]he trial court was required to receive two scoresheets and impose a guidelines sentence pursuant to each scoresheet.”).

Goode's remaining points on appeal are either without merit or have not been preserved for review.

REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing.

PER CURIAM.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network