MENDOZA v. STATE (2002)

District Court of Appeal of Florida,Third District.

Lazaro R. MENDOZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D01-1241.

Decided: February 13, 2002

Before GODERICH, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Lazaro Mendoza appeals his conviction and sentence for grand theft of a motor vehicle entered pursuant to a jury verdict. His only point on appeal is that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the state to peremptorily strike a prospective juror where the state's gender neutral reason for the strike was not supported by the record and therefore was not genuine. The record reflects, however, that this argument was not preserved for appellate review where the defense did not object to the existence of the facts proffered by the state in support of the strike. See Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225, 1229-30 (Fla.1990); Carter v. State, 762 So.2d 1024, 1026 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), rev. denied, 786 So.2d 1183 (Fla.2001). For that reason, we affirm the appellant's conviction and sentence.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network