DURBOROW v. SHUCK (1999)

District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fifth District.

Aaron M. DURBOROW, Appellant, v. Dawn E. SHUCK, Appellee.

No. 98-1389

Decided: January 28, 1999

Alan H. Landman, Melbourne, for Appellant. Richard A. Manzo of Law Offices of Manzo & Associates, P.A., Titusville, for Appellee.

ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

Based on the parties' motions for rehearing and clarification, and finding no useful purpose for reversing the order appealed given that the final custody hearing is set for less than two weeks hence, the opinion issued December 31, 1998 is hereby withdrawn. The order appealed is affirmed with the exception of the portion thereof ordering the father to contribute to the mother's attorney's fees. The trial court's finding that both parties are in need of attorney's fees precludes imposition of a fee order. Accordingly, the fee portion of the order is reversed and any payments made thereunder are directed to be returned.

MOTIONS for REHEARING and CLARIFICATION GRANTED; ORDER AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

GOSHORN, J.

COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network