Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
AIR AMBULANCE PROFESSIONALS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. THIN AIR, INC., a Florida corporation, Ross E. Vandever, Jr., as Director, Shareholder and individually, Thin Air, Inc., a Nevada corporation, by Brian L. Weisz, as shareholder, and individually, and Cirrus Air International, Inc., Appellees.
On December 22, 1997, at the beginning of the litigation below, the trial court ordered the parties to make deposits into their respective attorney's trust accounts. Neither party appealed the order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(B) as an order granting an injunction. The December 22 order was a mandatory injunction, since it commanded the parties to do a particular thing. Deposits were made in the trust accounts pursuant to the order.
After a jury trial, the trial court, on May 4, 2000, entered a final judgment awarding money damages against petitioner Air Ambulance Professionals, Inc. Air Ambulance filed post-trial motions. The trial court denied the motion for new trial on June 23, 2000, and ordered disbursal to appellee, Thin Air, Inc., of moneys Air Ambulance had deposited into the trust account. Air Ambulance timely appealed both the final judgment and the order disbursing funds. Air Ambulance later filed for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy was dismissed on August 7, 2000. Air Ambulance posted a bond on August 16, 2000, to cover the amount contained in the trust account.
By their conduct, the parties waived legal objections to the December 22 order requiring the placing of money in the trust accounts. This course of action benefitted both parties at different points in the litigation. Each party made deposits pursuant to the order. The parties contemplated that the trust accounts were places to park disputed moneys while the underlying businesses continued, until a final judgment determined entitlement to the funds.
Motions for new trial do not stay proceedings in the trial court, except that executions or other final process may not issue until the motion for new trial “is determined.” Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.550(a). Assuming the order releasing funds was a type of final process, there was no legal basis precluding disbursal of the money once the motion for new trial was denied on June 23. There was no stay pending review under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(a); Air Ambulance did not post a bond pursuant to rule 9.310(b)(1) until August 16, 2000.
We affirm the order of the trial court disbursing the money in the trust account. If the moneys still remain in the trust account, they should stay there pursuant to the August 16 bond until the appeal of the final judgment is completed.
GROSS, J.
FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D00-2597.
Decided: September 19, 2001
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)