Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Thamer R. AZULE, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and Hoover Industries, Inc., Appellees.
We reverse the order denying appellant unemployment benefits. Appellant did not appear at the hearing, and the record demonstrates that the notice of hearing was not sent to her current address. As failure to provide notice to a current address is a due process violation, see Oliver v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 616 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); see also Brennan v. Paul Barabas Interiors, 357 So.2d 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing concerning this issue. If the referee determines that notice was improperly mailed, the referee shall conduct a new hearing on the merits of appellant's claim.
Reversed and remanded.
SHEVIN, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D01-2995.
Decided: September 25, 2002
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)