Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Erman E. HINTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We deny Appellant's motion for rehearing but withdraw our opinion of May 6, 1998, and substitute the following opinion:
We affirm an order denying Appellant's motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.800(a). Appellant was convicted of one count of attempted burglary with a battery. He was sentenced as a habitual offender to 30 years imprisonment. The date of his crime was October 27, 1990. He claims that his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum for a third-degree felony. However, Appellant was convicted of attempted burglary with a battery, a second-degree felony, and was sentenced as a habitual offender. Since his crime occurred on October 27, 1990, the 1989 statutes apply to his sentence.
Section 810.02(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), provides that a burglary is a first-degree felony if, during the course of the crime, the defendant makes an assault or battery upon any person. Pursuant to section 777.04(4)(b), Florida Statutes, an attempted first-degree felony is a second-degree felony. The applicable habitual offender statute further provided for a maximum term of 30 years for second-degree felonies. Fla. Stat. § 775.084(4)(a)2 (1989).
In Tillman v. State, 525 So.2d 862 (Fla.1988), the supreme court considered a departure sentence imposed under the 1985 statutes for attempted burglary of a conveyance with an assault or battery. The court stated that absent the departure:
the statutory maximum of fifteen years ․ [would have been increased] to thirty years, the enhanced statutory maximum allowed under the habitual offender statute․
Id. at 863. Appellant, like the defendant in Tillman, faced a maximum sentence as a habitual offender of 30 years and that is what he received.
PER CURIAM.
STONE, C.J., and DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 98-0743.
Decided: July 15, 1998
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)