Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
G.R., etc., Appellant, v. MOLINA HEALTHCARE OF FLORIDA, INC., Appellee.
Under the regulations governing Medicaid, we have no choice but to affirm the dismissal by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration hearing officer of G.R.’s request for a “fair hearing.” G.R. properly made the request for additional personal care services to Molina Healthcare of Florida, Inc., his Medicaid provider. As the hearing officer found, however, after Molina Healthcare denied the request, G.R.’s attempt to obtain a “plan appeal” (that is, an internal review) by Molina Healthcare of its denial was untimely filed. G.R.’s request for a “plan appeal” had to be filed (not merely mailed) within 60 days from the date of the adverse benefit determination notice (not the receipt of the denial). See 42 C.F.R. § 438.402(c)(2)(ii) (“Following receipt of a notification of an adverse benefit determination by an MCO, PIHP, or PAHP, an enrollee has 60 calendar days from the date on the adverse benefit determination notice in which to file a request for an appeal to the managed care plan.” (emphases added)). Because G.R. did not timely file the “plan appeal,” G.R. is foreclosed from obtaining a fair hearing before a hearing examiner.
In affirming the dismissal, we note that Molina Healthcare acknowledged in its brief that:
G.R. is not precluded from again seeking additional personal care services. Long Term Care enrollees can ask for increased services at any time; accordingly, G.R. is free to request personal care services again if he believes those services are necessary. If his request is denied and he timely pursues a plan appeal, G.R. will be able to seek another fair hearing.
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D25-1158
Decided: February 25, 2026
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)