Amersham Enterprises, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Carlos Hakim-Daccach, Appellee. (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Amersham Enterprises, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Carlos Hakim-Daccach, Appellee.

No. 3D22-2095

Decided: April 17, 2024

Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and BOKOR, JJ.

Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Irina Khasin, and David B. Weinstein (Tampa), for appellants. Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP, David M. Gersten, and Joseph A. Sacher; Sequor Law P.A., Christopher A. Noel, Edward H. Davis, Jr., and Arnoldo B. Lacayo, for appellee.

Appellants Jorge Hakim-Tawil, Amersham Enterprises, Inc., Arkata Investments, Inc., Gyptec, S.A., n/k/a Violet Investment Corp. S.A. En Liquidacion, Leinster Garden Assets, Inc., and Ukiah International Corp. appeal the trial court's final judgment, rendered on November 4, 2022, in favor of Appellee Dr. Carlos Hakim-Daccach. Based upon Appellee's commendable confession of error as to the issue of setoff, and our independent review of the record, we accept the confession of error and reverse the final judgement for further proceedings consistent therewith. The final judgment is affirmed in all other respects.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network